Having learned the hard way that the higher speed films aren't quite as high as one might think (and with it still being the case that the whole pushing/pulling film thing still has me confounded), I metered everything at 1600 with my digital camera and doubled most times to account for reciprocity error/correction. The images appear below in the order in which I took the shots--the first 5 were taken yesterday mid-afternoon and the last three were taken this morning at about 8:45. Again, since I've not yet gotten around to mixing up a new batch of Diafine and since I really don't trust the (very old) liter of Microphen I have here, I decided to do a Rodinal stand. This allowed me to write while the film cooked. Below each image appears the time of the exposure along with the f-stop and shutter speed taken from the digital camera. Again, exposure times were at least doubled in most cases.
. . .oh yeah. and clearly, my obsession with the crutches rages on.

f 2.7, 1/200 = 30 second exposure

f 2.7, 1/20 = 7 minute exposure

f 2.7, 1/10 = 15 minute exposure

f 2.7, 1/125 = 1 minute exposure

f 2.7, 1/125 = 1 minute exposure

f 2.7, 1/1600 = 7 second exposure

f 2.7, 1/1600 = 7 second exposure

f 2.7, 1/1600 = 7 second exposure
2 comments:
Hi-
Very interesting experiments. Your posted samples seem to be equally sharp - what combination looked sharpest to you?
On the state park entrance - is that the one on rt 40? I'd like to follow your lead and take some shots on a weekend as soon as the temps drop a bit.
i'm not sure which combos seem sharpest, since i've not organized them that way. --and yes the one on 40.
Post a Comment